Detection of Glyphosate Residues in Animals and Humans Monika Krüger1 , Philipp Schledorn1 , Wieland Schrödl1 , Hans-Wolfgang Hoppe2 , Walburga Lutz3 and Awad A. Shehata1,4* 1 Institute of Bacteriology and Mycology of Veterinary Faculty, University of Leipzig, Germany 2 Medizinisches Labor Bremen Haferwende 12, 28357 Bremen, Germany 3 Wildlife Research Institute, Bonn, Germany 4 Avian and Rabbit Diseases Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sadat City University, Egypt

Keywords: Glyphosate; Animals; Husbandry cows; Health hazards; Gas Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS); ELISA

Introduction Glyphosate (N-phosphonomethyl glycine) is registered as herbicide for many food and non-food crops as well as non-crop areas where total vegetation control is desired. The predominating uses of glyphosate, in descending order, are stubble management, pre-sowing application and pre-harvest application (desiccation). Glyphosate is also used to prevent weeds in fields with glyphosate resistant genetically modified (GM) crops like soybean, rapeseed, corn, etc. Since 1996 the amount and the number of genetically engineered crops dramatically increased worldwide. It is estimated that 90% of the transgenic crops grown worldwide are glyphosate resistant [1]. The rapidly growing problem of glyphosate-resistant weeds is reflected in steady increases in the use of glyphosate on crops. Steams, leaves and beans of glyphosate resistant soy are contaminated with glyphosate. Moreover, due to the intensive use of glyphosate it was frequently detected in water, rain and air. Chang and coworkers [2] detected glyphosate concentrations in air and rain up to 2.5 μg/L in agricultural areas in Mississippi and Iowa. In Europe GM soybean for food and feed was admitted in 1996. All animals and humans eating this soy chronically incorporate unknown amounts of this herbicide. Residues of glyphosate in tissues and organs of food animals fed with GM feed (soybean, corn, etc.) are not considered or neglected in legislation. The influence of glyphosate residues on the quality of animal Products intended for human food is almost unknown. The incorporation of GM soybean meal in broiler feed significantly affects the color parameter for breast muscles [3]. In contrast Erickson and coworkers [4] did not find any effects on the performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. Furthermore, glyphosate is a potent chelator fixing trace and macro elements [5-7]. The mode of action of glyphosate is through specific inhibition of 5-enolpyruvyl shikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), an enzyme of the shikimate pathway that governs the synthesis of aromatic amino compounds in higher plants, algae, bacteria and fungi [8]. As this enzyme is absent in mammals it is often assumed that glyphosate is not harmful for mammalians. Even so, there is an ongoing debate about the safety of this herbicide. Firstly, long-term toxicology of the low glyphosate residues has not been investigated in vertebrates. Secondly although EPSPS is absent, glyphosate has been reported to inhibit other enzymes, e.g., enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (Cyp450) family [8]. Other inhibition pathways are reported. Richard et al. [9] reported that such as glyphosate inhibits Cyp450 aromatase inhibition, indicated crucial for sex steroid hormone synthesis. Glyphosate also interferes with cytochrome P450 enzymes which include numerous proteins able to metabolize xenobiotics [10]. This may also act synergistically with disruption of the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids by gut bacteria, as well as impairment in serum sulfate transport. Recently, it was suggested that gastrointestinal disorders, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, depression, autism, infertility, cancer and Alzheimer’s disease are associated with Western diet [11]. Furthermore, genotoxic activity [12], teratogenic activity [13], and disturbance of the normal gut bacterial community [14,15] due to glyphosate are reported. Glyphosate showed cytotoxic effects on different cells in vitro [16-18], and Barbosa et al. [19], proposed that glyphosate may have contributed to the Parkinsonism due to its chemical similarity with glycine, a co-factor required for activation of the N-methyl-d-aspartase (NMDA) receptor, which controls excitatory actions in the central nervous system and is also involved in memory and learning. However, in clinical studies has not shown NMDA activity in relation to glyphosate poisoning [20].

Abstract In the present study glyphosate residues were tested in urine and different organs of dairy cows as well as in urine of hares, rabbits and humans using ELISA and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS). The correlation coefficients between ELISA and GC-MS were 0.96, 0.87, 0.97and 0.96 for cattle, human, and rabbit urine and organs, respectively. The recovery rate of glyphosate in spiked meat using ELISA was 91%. Glyphosate excretion in German dairy cows was significantly lower than Danish cows. Cows kept in genetically modified free area had significantly lower glyphosate concentrations in urine than conventional husbandry cows. Also glyphosate was detected in different organs of slaughtered cows as intestine, liver, muscles, spleen and kidney. Fattening rabbits showed significantly higher glyphosate residues in urine than hares. Moreover, glyphosate was significantly higher in urine of humans with conventional feeding. Furthermore, chronically ill humans showed significantly higher glyphosate residues in urine than healthy population. The presence of glyphosate residues in both humans and animals could haul the entire population towards numerous health hazards, studying the impact of glyphosate residues on health is warranted and the global regulations for the use of glyphosate may have to be re-evaluated.

*Corresponding author: Dr. Awad A Shehata, Institute of Bacteriology and Mycology of Veterinary Faculty, University of Leipzig, Germany, Tel: 0049- 03419738183; Fax: 0049-03419738199; E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Received January 04, 2014; Accepted January 28, 2014; Published January 31, 2014 Citation: Krüger M, Schledorn P, Schrödl W, Hoppe HW, Lutz W, et al. (2014) Detection of Glyphosate Residues in Animals and Humans. J Environ Anal Toxicol 4: 210. doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000210 Copyright: © 2014 Krüger M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Krüger M, Schledorn P, Schrödl W, Hoppe HW, Lutz W, et al. (2014) Detection of Glyphosate Residues in Animals and Humans. J Environ Anal Toxicol 4: 210. doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.1000210 

The aim of the present study was to investigate if glyphosate residues in different biological samples from humans and animals can be used to gain insight in the exposure situation. Material and Methods Samples Samples from German dairy cows were collected as follow: urine from conventional husbandry (N=343), urine from cows kept in GM free areas (N=32), organs from slaughtered cows from conventional husbandry (gut wall [(N=32]), liver [N=41], kidney [N=26], lung [N=23] and muscles [N=6]. Urine samples also were collected from Danish cows (N=242). A total of 193 and 77 urine samples were collected from hares and fattening rabbits, respectively. In addition, a total of 99 and 41 urine samples were collected from humans with conventional or organic diet, respectively. Furthermore, a total of 102 and 199 urine samples were collected of healthy and chronically diseased humans. All samples were frozen at -20°C until analyzed. Sample preparations Tissue samples were minced to small pieces (~ 0.25 cm). In relation to the ability to retain water, samples were diluted with distilled water (Braun, Germany) at the rate of 1:1 (low water retention), 1:5 or 1:10 (high water retention). The specimens were heated at 100°C for 10 min, homogenized and frozen at -80°C for 8 h. Samples were carefully thawed at 40°C and centrifuged at 10.000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was filtered with an ultra-centrifugal filter with a cut off of 3000 Da to remove proteins and peptides. Filtrates were centrifuged (10.000 x g) again at 20°C for 10 min and the supernatant was tested for glyphosate using ELISA and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS). Urine samples were diluted with distilled water (Braun, Germany) at the rate of 1:20. ELISA Prepared samples were tested for glyphosate concentration by ELISA using glyphosate ELISA kits (Abraxis, USA) according to the manufacturer´s protocol. Test validation of ELISA was done in comparison with GC-MS and the Spearman rank order correlation analysis was calculated for human urine (N=14), cows urine (N=21), cow tissues (N=16), and rabbit urine (N=13). To study the recovery rate of glyphosate, meat samples were spiked with 100 μg of glyphosate which was carefully distributed in the meat and processed as mentioned above then the glyphosate was measured in the supernatant using ELISA. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy Glyphosate in urine and tissue samples was measured according to the procedure of Alferness and coworkers [21] with some modifications. Briefly, all chemicals used were of analytical grade unless stated otherwise. Urine samples and prepared tissue samples were thawed and equilibrated to room temperature. Samples were vortex mixed prior to transferring 100 μl aliquots to 10 ml screw-capped glass tubes containing 1 ml of acetonitrile. To each sample internal standard solution containing 13C215N-Glyphosate was added. After evaporation to dryness in a vacuum centrifuge, for derivatization 0.5 ml of 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol and cautiously 1 ml of freezing cold (-40°C) trifluoroacetic anhydride were added to the residue. The mixture was vortex mixed briefly and sonicated for 10 min and heated to 85°C for 1 h. After cooling the tube was uncapped and the solution was cautiously evaporated at 80-85°C without a stream of air or nitrogen. After cooling, the oily residue was dissolved in 200 μl of acetonitrile. The samples were measured using a GC-MSMS system. This system was composed of a gas chromatograph 7890 A equipped with a split/ split less injector connected to 7000 Triple-Quad mass spectrometer operating in the chemical ionization (NCI) -Mode (both instruments from Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). Statistical analysis The statistical analysis was carried out with GraphPad Prism 4 (GaphPad Software, La Jolla, USA). Two-way analysis of variance followed by unpaired Student t-test was used to identify significant differences between means. Results Validation of analytical method The correlation coefficients between ELISA and GC-MSMS were 0.96, 0.87, 0.97, and 0.96 for cattle urines, human urines, rabbit urines and tissues, respectively, (Table 1). The recovery rate of glyphosate in spiked meat was 91% (Table 2). Cattle Glyphosate excretion in German dairy cows was significantly (P<0.0001) higher than Danish cows (Figure 1A). Surprisingly, cows kept in GM free region had significantly (p<0.001) lower glyphosate concentrations in their urine compared with cows under conventional husbandry (Figure 1B). Also glyphosate was detected in different organs of slaughtered cows including intestine, liver, muscles, spleen and kidney (Figure 1C). There were no significant differences of glyphosate residues in these organs. Hares and rabbits Hares showed significantly lower (P<0.0001) glyphosate residues in urine than fattening rabbit (Figure 2). Humans Glyphosate was significantly higher (P<0.0002) in humans feed conventional feed compared with predominantly organic feed humans (Figure 3). Also the glyphosate residues in urine were grouped Glyphosate (µg/ml or µg/g) R2 ELISA GC-MS Minimum Maximum Mean ± SD Minimum Maximum Mean ± SD Human urine (N=14) 0.1 71.3 9± 15 01 40 5.4± 11.5 0.87 Cows urine (N=21) 0.46 164 27± 42 0 164 35± 50 0.96 Rabbit urine (N=16) 2.37 70 17.9±19 3.17 42 12.5±12.1 0.97 Organs (N=13) 1.36 80 14.7± 21 4.7 108 20±26 0.96 Table 1: Spearman rank order correlation analysis between ELISA and GC-MS. spiked glyphosate concentration (µg/g) sample number minimum (µg/g) maximum (µg/g) mean (µg/g) median (µg/g) standard deviation (µg/g) recovery rate % 100 8 75.25 164.56 109.26 103.02 30.13 91 Table 2: Recovery rate of glyphosate in spiked meat ELISA.